Management of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Today, and in the Future.

Treatment options have expanded rapidly and widely in the past two decades for patients with multiple myeloma. Triplet novel agent-based induction regimens have been accepted as the standard practice wordwide over the last decade both for transplant-eligible and non-eligible patients. The addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies as part of quadruplet regimens has led to even deeper and longer-lasting responses. The impressive results shown by the quadruplets havebeen practice-changing where accessible in recent years. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies are being tested in the upfront setting and have the potential to once again shift the paradigm of treatment of newly diagnosed MM.

A Landmark Paper That Introduced Proteasome Inhibition in Myeloma.

The ongoing therapeutic revolution in multiple myeloma care can be traced to the turn of the millennium with the unanticipated discovery in 1999 that the cereblon binding small molecule thalidomide had profound clinical effectiveness and, simultaneously, the emergence of a new class of targeted therapies inhibiting the proteasome, both of which ultimately target ubiquitinated protein degradation. These contemporaneous discoveries forever changed the landscape of multiple myeloma care, substantially extending survival. Foreshadowing this seismic change, Nobel Prize winning work on the proteasome ubiquitin pathway had stimulated the development of highly specific proteasome inhibitor small molecules, particularly PS-341 (later named bortezomib). An abundance of the proteasome in hematologic malignancies had been recognized and thus PS-341 was logically being explored in relevant preclinical models. Concurrent with phase I trials, which were soon to prove the significant clinical relevance of preclinical models, the laboratory of Dr. Kenneth Anderson and colleagues at Dana-Farber, in partnership with Dr. Julian Adams and scientists at ProScript (later Millennium Pharmaceuticals) first demonstrated that the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibited growth, induced apoptosis, and overcame drug resistance in human multiple myeloma cells. This landmark paper in Cancer Research set the stage for a paradigm shift in how multiple myeloma was managed across all stages of the disease, which changed the lives of patients worldwide. See related article by Hideshima and colleagues, Cancer Res 2001;61:3071-6.

Single-cell profiling of multiple myeloma reveals molecular response to FGFR3 inhibitor despite clinical progression.

Genomic characterization of cancer has enabled identification of numerous molecular targets, which has led to significant advances in personalized medicine. However, with few exceptions, precision medicine approaches in the plasma cell malignancy multiple myeloma (MM) have had limited success, likely owing to the subclonal nature of molecular targets in this disease. Targeted therapies against FGFR3 have been under development for the past decade in the hopes of targeting aberrant FGFR3 activity in MM. FGFR3 activation results from the recurrent transforming event of t(4;14) found in ∼15% of MM patients, as well as secondary FGFR3 mutations in this subgroup. To evaluate the effectiveness of targeting FGFR3 in MM, we undertook a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the small-molecule FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients with or without FGFR3 mutations (NCT02952573). Herein, we report on a single t(4;14) patient enrolled on this study who was identified to have a subclonal FGFR3 stop-loss deletion. Although this individual eventually progressed on study and succumbed to their disease, the intended molecular response was revealed through an extensive molecular characterization of the patient's tumor at baseline and on treatment using single-cell genomics. We identified elimination of the FGFR3-mutant subclone after treatment and expansion of a preexisting clone with loss of Chromosome 17p. Altogether, our study highlights the utility of single-cell genomics in targeted trials as they can reveal molecular mechanisms that underlie sensitivity and resistance. This in turn can guide more personalized and targeted therapeutic approaches, including those that involve FGFR3-targeting therapies.

Monoclonal Gammopathies of 'Neurological Significance': Paraproteinemic Neuropathies.

OBJECTIVES: To study the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with paraproteinemic neuropathy (PPN) and to explore the utility of nerve conduction studies (NCSs) to differentiate between the demyelinating subtypes. METHODS: We did a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with PPN between January 2010 and December 2019 in an inpatient setting. The study population consisted of patients above 16 years of age presenting with clinical features suggestive of chronic peripheral neuropathy and on evaluation was found to have PPN. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were identified. The patients were predominantly in the 6th decade, and the majority were males. The subtypes of PPN were monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) (45.9%), POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal plasma cell disorder, and skin changes) (24.3%), solitary plasmacytoma (17.6%), multiple myeloma (8.1%), and AL amyloidosis (4.1%). There are specific features on NCS which can help in identifying POEMS syndrome and IgM MGUS. The majority of patients with PPN tend to stabilize or improve with treatment; however, many have a severe residual disability. New terminology and classification of these entities as 'monoclonal gammopathies of neurological significance' can aid in early diagnosis and the development of effective treatment, to prevent residual disability. CONCLUSION: PPN has a heterogeneous spectrum of clinical, biochemical, and electrophysiological features. NCS can help distinguish POEMS syndrome and IgM MGUS from other demyelinating subtypes.

Prognostic plasma biomarkers of early complications and graft-versus-host disease in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Early complications post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) such as sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) and graft versus host disease (GVHD) can be life threatening. Although several biomarkers have been identified to correlate with these complications and their response to treatment, these are yet to be used in clinical practice. Here, we evaluated circulating endothelial cells (CECs) (n = 26) and plasma biomarkers (ST2, REG3α, VCAM1, ICAM1, TIM3) (N = 210) at early time points, to determine their association with early complications post-HSCT. Elevated CEC counts at the end of conditioning was associated with GVHD, indicating endothelial damage during HSCT. Plasma levels of REG3α, VCAM1, ICAM1, and TIM3 on day 14 (D14) and D14 ICAM1 and D28 ST2 were significantly higher in patients with SOS and aGVHD, respectively. Upon sub-group analysis, D28 ST2, D14/D28 REG3α, and D14ICAM1 levels were significantly higher in patients with gastrointestinal GVHD, while D28ST2 was higher in those with skin/liver GVHD. High ST2 levels on D28 was significantly associated with non-relapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival. Our results suggest that elevated ST2 levels on D28 could predict the likelihood of developing aGVHD and could influence NRM and OS.

Impact of imaging modality on clinical outcome in Hodgkin lymphoma in a resource constraint setting.

Treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has evolved with risk-stratified therapy based on PET-CT scan at multiple timepoints. In a resource constraint setting even a single PET-CT scan ($400) is inaccessible to many patients, who are re-assessed with only clinical examination, abdominal ultrasonogram and/or x-ray (C/U/X) ($10). To compare clinical outcomes in patients with HL who have had suboptimal imaging after completion of chemotherapy for HL, with those who had a CT or PET-CT, 283 patients were treated for HL from 2011 to 2015, and 268 patients completed six cycles of ABVD therapy with response assessment modality by CT/PET in 185 patients and by C/U/X in 83. There was no difference in the number of patients with advanced (64·1% vs. 61·1%; P = 0·650) or bulk disease (8·1% vs. 7·2%). A significantly higher number of patients in the CT/PET group received IFRT (25·4% vs. 7·7%; P = 0·0005). The three-year overall survival and progression-free survival of all treated patients (n = 283) was 83·5 ± 2·3% and 76·7 ± 2·6% respectively [median follow-up 36 months (range 2-93)]. At three years, the overall relapse-free survival (RFS) was 80·1 ± 2·5%, with RFS of 77 ± 3·2% vs. 85 ± 4·0% in the CT/PET group and C/U/X groups respectively (P = 0·349). There was no difference in RFS between the two groups either in early-stage disease (88·1 ± 4·6% vs. 91·8 ± 5·6%; P = 0·671) or late-stage disease (73·9 ± 4·8% vs. 81·3 ± 6·0%; P = 0·747). The only significant factor adversely affecting RFS was advanced disease (P = 0·004). Factors not affecting RFS were age (P = 0·763), sex (P = 0·925), bulk disease (P = 0·889) and imaging modality (P = 0·352). There was no difference in relapse rates between patients who had suboptimal imaging compared to those who had a PET/CT. It is possible to use these basic imaging modalities when resources are a constraint, with acceptable outcomes.